Legitimacy
The reason a governance body, process, or rule should be recognised as authoritative.
Resources
Key concepts and related sites for following the governance dimension of increasingly autonomous robotic systems.
A compact vocabulary for reading robot governance as a field of institutional responsibility, deployment design, and public accountability.
The reason a governance body, process, or rule should be recognised as authoritative.
The structured allocation of answerability when a robotic system acts, errs, or causes downstream effects.
The review, audit, challenge, and intervention functions surrounding the deployment of robotic systems.
The legal and institutional allocation of responsibility when robotic systems cause harm, loss, or downstream effects.
The conditions under which robotic systems are introduced into workplaces, homes, infrastructure, or shared public spaces.
A proposed identity and lifecycle record framework for robotic systems, covering identification, ownership, permissions, deployment, maintenance, incidents, updates, and transfer.
The linked set of manufacturers, owners, operators, deployers, maintainers, supervisors, insurers, and public bodies that may share duties around a robot.
A persistent record that connects a specific robotic system to its ID, model, configuration, manufacturer, and operational status.
A record of the robot's changes over time, including deployment, maintenance, updates, incidents, transfer, and retirement.
The institutional approval that defines where a robot may operate, what tasks it may perform, and what safeguards must be present.
The practical control and day-to-day responsibility held by an owner, operator, facility, lessee, or maintenance organisation.
The recognised permission to start, stop, supervise, update, restrict, or redeploy a robotic system in a given environment.
A record of accidents, near misses, emergency stops, malfunctions, complaints, unusual behaviour, and corrective actions.
The ability to reconstruct what happened, which system was involved, which permissions applied, and who had responsibility at the time.
The use of robots in shared environments where affected people may not be direct customers, owners, or trained users.
The institutional capacity for people to monitor, pause, intervene, review, and revise robotic system behaviour.
The institutional layer around a robot that defines authorisation, supervision, recordkeeping, response, and accountability.
This site belongs to a wider field-building effort around human-machine relations, rights, labour, and institutions.
Related programs
Robot Governance focuses on institutions, standards, and accountability. Closely related programs include Robot Rights and Robot Labor.